I can't see how any Mac or Linux gamer even the most hardcore ones can complain about this approach. I personally think GOG need to take this approach and then just systematically work through all their games this way. Then finally your more complex games newer games, these need native Linux ports. Tons I wanna play on Linux: Roller-coaster Tycoon, Commandos, SWAT 3, Pharaoh etc. it needs and run it in an isolated environment. Give it only the windows dll's, scripts etc. Then old (would never see a native Linux or Mac port since they just too old), simple (can run in an isolated environment meaning no calls or writes to registry), basic non dos games = (potential for a wine bottled release) so you basically do to these games exactly what you would do to a dos game using dos box. What I personally think they should do is from an organizational perspective firstly and this is on both Mac and Linux, sort games according to: Dos games = Dos Box (why they still haven't put all their dos games on Linux is beyond me, they had this pretty much sorted first thing for Mac). Secondly if GOG through all their support into making this happen why would they ever bother to make a native Linux port ever again?

I personally feel this is a stupid idea for 2 reasons: First what if I'm a Linux user that doesn't support a full instance of wine taking over my machine cause lets face it many people are of this mindset. You can't invite this user because you have blocked him. You can't chat with this user because you have blocked him.

You can't chat with this user due to their or your privacy settings. User since Unblock chat User blocked This user's wishlist is not public. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation.

Support Windows games using wine in the Galaxy client for Linux and Mac Added by hjahre hjahre Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable.

Wine play windows games on mac